Should a planet in exile be considered "less powerful" than a planet in domicile and that it cannot become a dominant, due to its difficult position? Some people would answer no, because a so-called malefic planet in exile or in fall has its incapacitating potential increased, hence, its power. Both bonus and penalty increase the importance of the said planet and they impact on the whole series of usual criteria: hierarchy of the elements, modes, houses, signs, etc. On the other hand, it is also mentioned that calculation methods include a bonus in the first two cases and a penalty in the other two. The varying degree of the strength of a planet, when in one of the above cases, constitutes quite a strange debate in the sense that, on the one hand, it is written that a planet in domicile or in exaltation is most potent and "gives of its best", and that when in exile or in fall, it is thwarted.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |